Search for: "Jones Act"
Results 621 - 640
of 8,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
SMSH Partner Matt Shaffer settled the case of a Jones Act Deckhand with an unoperated back for a total of $409,000. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:24 am
Link Financial Ltd v Jones [2012] EWHC 2402 (QB); [2012] WLR (D) 251 “A legal assignee of the debt due under a regulated consumer credit agreement which had given notice of the assignment to the debtor was a “creditor” within the meaning of section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and entitled to bring proceedings to recover the debt.” WLR Daily, 22nd August 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:19 am
Jones v First-tier Tribunal [2011] EWCA Civ 400; [2011] WLR (D) 131 “An offence of inflicting grevious bodily harm, contrary to section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, was a ‘crime of violence’ for the purposes of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2001. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:34 am
Inside Track Podcast: Neil Kinsella, Chief Executive and Managing Partner of Russell Jones and Walker Today I am talking to Neil Kinsella, Chief Executive and Managing Partner of Russell Jones and Walker. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 7:33 am
Jones sued Twitter (pro se) for (1) defamation, (2) tortious interference, (3) aiding and abetting, (4) conspiracy, (5) ratification, (6) retraction, (7) violation of Section 230(c), (8) ECPA, (9) Civil Rights Act Title II/III, (10) Civil Rights Act Title VI, (11) FTC Act, (12) 18 USC 241, (13) 18 USC 242, (14) 18 USC 245, and (15) JASTA. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:20 am
New Jones Act case from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:06 pm
appeared first on Jones Gregg Creehan & Gerace. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:40 pm
The “central focus” of the Jones act is protection from “physical perils. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:31 am
It appears that the Sorrell decision supports the conclusion of earlier maritime cases indicating that a Jones Act employer is held to the same standard of causation in a negligence analysis as his seaman-employee The Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:15 am
Read the rest of Kyrillos Introduces Resolution Urging Waiver of Jones Act in Times of Emergency (252 words) [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
For example, an employee seeking coverage under the Jones Act must be classified as a seaman. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:29 pm
In addition to the alleged copyright violation and “hot new” misappropriation, Briefing.com is alleged to violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by striping the Dow Jones copyright notice from the articles that it redistributes. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Declines to Hold Jones Act Employer Liable and Vessel Unseaworthy appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Acting on suspicions that Antoine Jones was selling drugs, the government attached a GPS device to his car. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
BREAKING NEWS -- SCHECHTER, MCELWEE, SHAFFER & HARRIS, LLP has settled a Jones Act injury case for $17,755,000! [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am
In Scottish Federation of Housing Associations v Jones [2022] EAT 114, Ms Jones was Head of Membership and Policy of the Federation. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Latsis sets out a two-part test for whether someone is a seaman covered under the Jones Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:27 am
-flagged ships.The law also restricts interstate shipping to vessels owned by U.S. companies and crewed mainly by U.S. citizens....The lawsuit contends the Jones Act violates the Constitution's Commerce Clause by artificially inflating prices of goods shipped between Hawaii and the mainland to such an extent that it becomes an unlawful restraint on trade and interstate commerce. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 10:57 am
The police acted with a search warrant, claiming they are investigating whether Jones improperly accessed a state messaging system without authorization to coax state officials into speaking out about coronavirus deaths. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:53 pm
A distinction, however, is that some courts have deemed a 2703(d) order under the Stored Communications Act sufficient for CSLI (see, e.g. [read post]
