Search for: "Jordan v. R " Results 621 - 640 of 889
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm by blogarbadmin
It is interesting to see how ICSID tribunals, which confirmed frivolity of the claim, had decided on allocation of costs (Trans-Global v Jordan, Global Trading v Ukraine, RSM Production v Grenada) and what impact these decisions may have on the future application of the Rule. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am by Wessen Jazrawi
R (on the application of McClure and Moos) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 12. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:09 am by sally
In a unanimous ruling the Court held that the UK could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to his native Jordan, overturning the House of Lords (who had unanimously come to the opposite conclusion in RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10, [2010] 2 AC 110).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 19th January 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Robert Chesney
The European Court of Human Rights has issued a ruling  (Othman (Abu Qatada) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 8:14 am
However, the form did not exactly comply with New Mexico's strict requirements for a "knowing" waiver, as set out in Jordan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
Thus the Case of the Week is Jordan v. [read post]