Search for: "Judicial Correctional Services Inc" Results 621 - 640 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
But entities like IV take the view that they are providing a valuable service — they provide inventors with easy access to the economic incentive that fuels invention. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Waren-Verein, says the Court, is a trade association located in Hamburg, Germany that provides arbitration services. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Missed the first day, but here's the second:Panel 5: Social Media, Privacy and the UserModerator: Jonathan Obar (MSU)Matt Jackson (PSU)Concern about exploitation/commodification of user by marketers. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
In addition, he quotes Justice Scalia’s opinion in Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
From the blogs The comedian Robin Ince discusses the recent controversy around Ricky Gervais’s tweets. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm by Vivian Persand
This week I will explain the Fifth District Court of Appeals’ March 2011 holding in SEACOR Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:17 pm by SOIssues
Arnone and state Judicial Branch Support Service Division Executive Director William H. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Yet again, a majority finds pro-arbitration federal policy circumscribes judicial authority to police arbitration agreements under state law. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The FTC construed the MMWA as barring pre-dispute mandatory binding arbitration provisions covering written warranty agreements and issued a rule prohibiting judicial enforcement of such provisions with respect to consumer claims brought under the MMWA. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am by Elizabeth Burch
For claims that escape arbitration, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:15 pm by Law Lady
" Pharmaceuticals (Federal Preemption): SUPREME COURT SAYS GENERICS MAKERS NOT REQUIRED TO RELEASE WARNINGS, Pliva Inc. v. [read post]