Search for: "Kay v. Kay"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2011, 1:09 am
V- ESASIN ? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
In that case the House of Lords gave the SIAC procedure, in the words of Maurice Kay LJ, a “clear bill of health”. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision in Lesher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Layton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm
Mahler of Farrell Fritz in his New York Business Divorce Blog Will Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Lesher v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
” The plaintiff was Tonya Kay Day. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am
Elmowitz v McCormick Dunne & Foley, 30 Misc 3d 1209 (A) (Supreme Court New York County 2010), citing Jacobs v Kay, 50 AD3d 526, 527 (1 Dept. 2008); Costalas v Amalfitano, 305 AD2d 202 203-204 (1 st Dept. 2003). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 June 2011 the Court of Appeal (Maurice Kay and Carnwath LJJ and Sir Henry Brooke) will hear three appeals in the libel case of Andre v Price – from decisions of Mr Justice Tugendhat on 11 and 13 October 2010. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
Referring to AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer [2009] EWCA Civ 634, in which it was said that hardship does not of itself render a matter disproportionate, especially where alternative provision for exceptional cases is made (Kay LJ, at [29]). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
The judge granted possession, considering himself bound by Kay v Lambeth, and refused to consider the art 8 defence. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
Accountability requires that the accountable person is obliged to explain the state of affairs tohttp://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/shoesmith-v-ofsted-others-judgment-270511.pdfwhich it attaches. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am
Lord Justice Maurice Kay accepted that “the context – the protection of vulnerable children – is important and, together with a degree of urgency may impact on the requirement of procedural fairness“. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:15 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger MR, Maurice Kay and Stanley Burnton LJJ though the principal judgment was handed down by Maurice Kay LJ. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:14 pm
This is especially so as in Kay v UK, the ECtHR, while deciding the case on the basis of the applicable domestic law at the time of the House of Lords decision in Kay, did make reference to domestic law post-Doherty. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:14 pm
This is especially so as in Kay v UK, the ECtHR, while deciding the case on the basis of the applicable domestic law at the time of the House of Lords decision in Kay, did make reference to domestic law post-Doherty. [read post]
