Search for: "Keen v. Keen" Results 621 - 640 of 1,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
 Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Robert Engelhart QC, is a fascinating case which has much to teach the business community and the design profession. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
House of Representatives; since 2005, the bill keeps getting reintroduced with various judges across the country expressing keen interest in getting cameras in their courts. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
”  At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen also focuses on the questions drafted by the Court and suggests that the second question is “the nagging one. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:46 pm by Giles Peaker
The decisions made by the Court of Appeal in Keen Philips v Field and Marcan Shipping, to which I have referred in this regard, remain in my view good law. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm by Lucy Reed
The first judgment : A Local Authority v B, F & G [2014] EWCOP B18 (21 March 2014)  HHJ Cardinal in Court of Protection. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
Straightforwardly unlawful. b. is, I presume, based upon a misapprehension of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 [our report]. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by Darryl Hutcheon, Matrix
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
Then came a helpful explanation by guest contributor Christian Schalk as to why both companies should be so keen on retaining their right to use the name. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 3:14 am
OHG v OHIM, Alifoods, SA, a ruling which this Kat has tackled in French but with a good deal of help from an electronic translation service.Might consumers believethat this is Aldi Cat? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
Lisa Keen of the Keen News Services reviews the state of play for challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, as well as how the Court might rule on those challenges. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
  [1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]