Search for: "LONG v. PARKER"
Results 621 - 640
of 667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards. 3) Its long-term effects. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Farris et alAT&T v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 2:57 pm
* Google was denied attorneys fees in the long-running Parker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
Parker, 139 Wn.2d at 505. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
(Here is a long list of earlier ILB entries.) [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:22 pm
Parker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Christine Parker, Professor, University of Melbourne Law School, Australia, Peering Over the Ethical Precipice: Incorporation, Listing, and the Ethical Responsibilities of Law Firms Elizabeth Chambliss, Professor, New York Law School, Law Firm General Counsel: The Paradox of Institutional Success? [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 3:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Jimenez, No. 05-4098 "A check kiting scheme involving only one bank, where the defendant moved funds between various accounts at that institution, still violates the bank fraud statute as long as the elements of bank fraud are satisfied. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Supply v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
But fortunately for us, and by extension all of you reading this, one of our old friends (and a dedicated reader) was there - Tom Parker, an Ohio lawyer we've worked with on important medical device cases for years.Here's what he has to say about the Riegel oral argument:[It's all Tom from here on, until further notice - except for our bracketed comments, of course]The oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:37 am
If you would like more information on cerebral palsy please visit our website and as always, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me: E-mail: robert@dioriofirm.com Phone: (888) 456-4658 NEW MEXICO STATE RESOURCES AGING New Mexico Aging & Long-Term Services Department 228 East Palace Avenue Santa Fe, NM 87501 Phone: (505) 827-7640; (800) 432-2080 (Toll Free in New Mexico) E-mail: nmaoa@state.nm.us Web: http://www.nmaging.state.nm.usdefault.asp 1410 San… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
