Search for: "LTD T"
Results 621 - 640
of 9,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 12:02 am
The Fact On 7 April 2009, the original plaintiff, TYM, sued Shanghai Runteyi Industrial Co., Ltd (“first original defendant”), Shanghai Runheng International Trading Co., Ltd (“second original defendant”) and Ms. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 7:02 am
Oovee, Ltd, 2:21-cv-01201-JHC (W.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 8:13 pm
Since OPPO's withdrawal from the German market in August, things haven't gone too well for Nokia in its dispute with the Chinese smartphone giant. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Freedom of expression is enshrined in almost every constitution globally. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 1:24 pm
But Global 100 weren’t, as neither owner nor lessee of the property. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 550 U.S. 618 (2007); Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
On 14 September 2022, Google’s appeal against a €4.34 billion antitrust fine handed down by the European Union four years ago failed in the General Court, Case T‑604/18. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Comment B: WL Hayhurst, “The Canadian Supreme Court on Copyright: CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The case of WaterRower (UK) Ltd v Liking Ltd (T/A Topiom) concerned an application for strike out and/or summary judgment of a claim made by WaterRower against Liking for copyright infringement, involving a water resistance rowing machine called the WaterRower (pictured here) developed by the company of the same name. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:09 am
The case of WaterRower (UK) Ltd v Liking Ltd (T/A Topiom) concerned an application for strike out and/or summary judgment of a claim made by WaterRower against Liking for copyright infringement, involving a water resistance rowing machine called the WaterRower (pictured here) developed by the company of the same name. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
But don’t we know by now that nearly any software invention can arguably fit into one of these categories? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The Gov’t CVSG brief was filed by folks at the DOJ SG’s. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm
In July, the General Court ruled in Case T-768/20 (Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO) on the importance of distinguishing between the place where hotel and ancillary services are offered and the specific place of use of the mark when assessing genuine use of EU trade marks. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
[A First Amendment framework for analyzing restrictions on election-related speech.] [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:00 am
Subway Franchise Advertising Fund Trust Ltd., — F. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:38 am
., Ltd., Serial No. 88848727 (September 15, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The Court of Appeal rejected the mark as not being a 'sign' as it couldn't be clearly graphically represented and therefore lacks "clarity, precision, self-containment, durability and objectivity".Justice Meade then moved on to the Hearing Officer's decision. [read post]
