Search for: "Lady v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:45 pm
Do you wish this lady (Mrs. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Virginia Matthews also stated in voir dire that she did not use Facebook. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Maynard battled former solicitor general Don Verrilli in the case of The Weird Sisters v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
” Packingham v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:19 pm
(Photo credits: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States) Recent Stories on Constitution Daily Podcast: Loving v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Image: Flickr.com R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Our Lady's Inn v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:12 am
In Iqbal v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm
How do you like them … In 2015, a dispute concerning the rights to a Chilean trade mark for PINK LADY apples came before the Victorian Supreme Court in the matter of Apple & Pear Australia Ltd v Pink Lady America LLC [2015] VSC 617. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm
How do you like them … In 2015, a dispute concerning the rights to a Chilean trade mark for PINK LADY apples came before the Victorian Supreme Court in the matter of Apple & Pear Australia Ltd v Pink Lady America LLC [2015] VSC 617. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
” Harland Sanders used his military title (also an honorary rank in a state militia, here of course Kentucky) to sell fried chicken. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am
The article referred to Ms Pierdant being sanctioned by the Mexican state oil firm Pemex, for administrative negligence and her being given a one year ban from work within the public sector as a result. [read post]
