Search for: "Lane v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 2,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2024, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, “[o]n a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Georgica Bldrs., Ltd. v 136 Bishops Lane, LLC, 175 AD3d at 611; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:25 am by Michael DelSignore
The accident reconstruction reported stated that the accident was caused by the defendant's failure to stay within the mark lanes. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am by Lawrence Taylor
This is enough time to miss seeing a driver ahead that hit their brakes, not see someone who has stepped out onto the road or veer out of your lane. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm by Viking
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  Most Ohio courts, for example, follow the 6th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  He then made an abrupt lane change, cutting across two lanes, and drove onto Hotel Circle. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]