Search for: "Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
I served as the law member of the Dawson County Mental Health Board that imposed civil commitment orders. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
A motion to quash/modify a federal subpoena can brought under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c)(2) in criminal matters and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3) for civil matters. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm
The United Kingdom is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“the ICCPR”) and is bound by its terms as a matter of international law. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 11:35 am
In fact, in some key areas, such as refusals to deal under section 75, relatively significant substantive case law has developed because private access application rights were introduced. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:29 am
The court held that: The use of administrative tribunals for enforcement of common law claims violated the respondent’s right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment (U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
” — Pauli Murray in a letter to the National Organization for Women In addition to Murray’s foundational work in women’s and civil rights, Murray also served the ACLU on its national board of directors and as part of an advisory committee guiding its women’s rights work. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:28 pm
They get to work, however gauzy the relationship, under the aegis of the prestigious International Trademark Association; they get to do trademark stuff that is likely to make them better trademark lawyers; and, yeah, they get to tip the balance a little bit in the civil (litigation) wars or, as the case may be, with other (civil) representation involving trademark law. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 7:54 am
But here the value is in speech contributions to social order and social progress under the guidance of the vanguard. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:51 am
I would also highlight that the presence of s. 9 should raise a red flag: “9 No civil proceedings lie against any person for their disclosure in good faith of information under this Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:11 pm
Guests: Tom Schoenberg: Bloomberg News, @tschoenberg22 Andrew Cohen: CBS Radio News, @CBSAndrew Tom Fitton: Judicial Watch, @TomFitton Marcia Johnson-Blanco: Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Not much has changed since then, right? [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Arnold Loewy and Charles Moster debated how the lack of civility is affecting Congress. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:52 pm
Or Mesa Bankruptcy Lawyers, or Chandler, or Casa Grande Bankruptcy Lawyers. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:47 am
He served on the Consumer Advisory Panel to AT&T from 1990 to 1999, as Ombudsman for Utah Power and Light, and was a board member of the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:51 pm
Everyone who knows me, knows that when it comes to the civil side of my practice, I am a plaintiffs’ lawyer. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
Under reformed rules, referral to a trial committee would be the routine, default choice, not the exception. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The nature of liability for what U.S. lawyers would understand as direct and derivative actions, and the scope of the right to assert either, are somewhat different than in the US. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
From time to time, class action lawyers on both sides of the v pressed the Civil Rules Advisory Committee to add a new category for settlement class actions to Rule 23 but those efforts never succeeded. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:35 pm
The hotline is run by Election Protection, a coalition of lawyers’ groups, such as the Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the Brennan Center for Justice. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
Rather, noting that “context matters” when determining whether a work rule violates the NLRA, the court found the policies read in the context of the workplace established common sense civility guidelines that a reasonable employee would not read as chilling or discouraging organization activities protected under Section 7. [read post]
