Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 621 - 640
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(Sabbah v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
“Character” in Walzer’s sense may extend to population density; residents may believe that a more dispersed population is more conducive to habits of leisure or a more relaxed pace of life. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
He could take his time and read the document at his leisure before deciding to become a Lyft contractor (or as he argues, employee). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
(Image Michelle V. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
So to increase value, need to turn it back into a leisure-time activity. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Recruitment v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Hearing Impairments Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Governor Baxter School for the Deaf Mackworth Island Falmouth, ME 04105 Phone: (207) 781-6215 (Newborn to age 5); (207) 781-6244 (Grades K - 12) Programs for Children and Youth who are Blind or Visually Impaired or Deaf-Blind Division for the Blind and Visually Impaired 150 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0150 Phone: (207) 624-5959 Maine Center on Deafness, MCD 68 Bishop Street, Suite 3 Portland, ME… [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
In the first case (Kasic v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am
Going into the House select committee’s hearings to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, press coverage was cautious—even dour—about what the effort would be able to accomplish. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
