Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 621 - 640 of 21,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 11:18 am by Frankl & Kominsky Injury Lawyers
Thus, if a jury finds that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff, enters judgment in the plaintiff’s favor, and then enters an award too large or too small, the judge can review the jury’s award. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:23 pm by John C. Manoog III
In most Cape Cod personal injury lawsuits, the main issue is whether the defendant should be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries and, if so, the amount of compensation to which the plaintiff is entitled for his or her medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering, and other damages. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appellate court concluded that the possibility of Lexington’s vicarious liability for ACC’s negligence brought this action within the broad duty of Pekin’s duty to defend. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 am
A Connecticut Superior Court recently awarded summary judgment against an insurer on the basis that the a home seller’s misrepresentation regarding the existence of lead paint in the home constituted an “occurrence” under her insurance policy and, therefore, the insurer had a duty to defend the seller in a lawsuit alleging negligent misrepresentation and was liable for paying the stipulated judgment agreed to by the parties. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
The court held that most of the defendants were liable for Establishment Clause and Free Exercise violations. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
With respect to O’Brien’s “off-the-clock” claim, the defendants argued that they were “not liable under the FLSA because there is no evidence that defendants knew that O’Brien was working without compensation. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm by Andrew Frisch
With respect to O’Brien’s “off-the-clock” claim, the defendants argued that they were “not liable under the FLSA because there is no evidence that defendants knew that O’Brien was working without compensation. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:29 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The applicable statue required that the plaintiff establish the defendant city had notice of the fallen sign, otherwise the city would be entitled to governmental immunity. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:20 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
The Court’s decision in Staub didn’t address whether the biased supervisor can be held individually liable in cat’s paw cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
The court upheld a Cook County verdict that found the defendant homeowner liable for the injuries the plaintiff sustained after falling down a stairwell at the defendant's home. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 6:28 am
A jury found the defendant liable, but the trial judge granted the defendant judgment as a matter of law, finding the verdict could only be based on speculation. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am by Schwartz & Perry
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]