Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 621 - 640
of 21,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 11:18 am
Thus, if a jury finds that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff, enters judgment in the plaintiff’s favor, and then enters an award too large or too small, the judge can review the jury’s award. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:14 pm
The media defendants argued that Voller’s case was based on an incorrect understanding of the law. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:23 pm
In most Cape Cod personal injury lawsuits, the main issue is whether the defendant should be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries and, if so, the amount of compensation to which the plaintiff is entitled for his or her medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering, and other damages. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 5:52 am
When a car accident occurs, there may be more than one party who is liable for the victim’s injuries. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:21 pm
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:21 pm
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that the possibility of Lexington’s vicarious liability for ACC’s negligence brought this action within the broad duty of Pekin’s duty to defend. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 am
A Connecticut Superior Court recently awarded summary judgment against an insurer on the basis that the a home seller’s misrepresentation regarding the existence of lead paint in the home constituted an “occurrence” under her insurance policy and, therefore, the insurer had a duty to defend the seller in a lawsuit alleging negligent misrepresentation and was liable for paying the stipulated judgment agreed to by the parties. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
The court held that most of the defendants were liable for Establishment Clause and Free Exercise violations. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
With respect to O’Brien’s “off-the-clock” claim, the defendants argued that they were “not liable under the FLSA because there is no evidence that defendants knew that O’Brien was working without compensation. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
With respect to O’Brien’s “off-the-clock” claim, the defendants argued that they were “not liable under the FLSA because there is no evidence that defendants knew that O’Brien was working without compensation. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Burton’s injured knee was not treated until March 2010, when he was finally seen by defendant Dr. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:29 am
The applicable statue required that the plaintiff establish the defendant city had notice of the fallen sign, otherwise the city would be entitled to governmental immunity. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:20 am
The Court’s decision in Staub didn’t address whether the biased supervisor can be held individually liable in cat’s paw cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
The court upheld a Cook County verdict that found the defendant homeowner liable for the injuries the plaintiff sustained after falling down a stairwell at the defendant's home. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 6:28 am
A jury found the defendant liable, but the trial judge granted the defendant judgment as a matter of law, finding the verdict could only be based on speculation. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In a fairly recent case handed down by the New York Court of Appeals, employers are held strictly liable for a supervisor’s conduct in sexual harassment cases. [read post]