Search for: "Lilly v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Eli Lilly and Co., 2010 WL 3892464, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
--Noel v The Boeing Co., 3rdCir, October 1, 2010: in an issue of first impression in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, the Court holds that the appellant's Title VII discrimination claim was untimely. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:23 pm
On Friday, the Third Circuit addressed the scope of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (FPA) in Noel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:30 am
She's also been courting tea party groups and has pledged to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:37 pm
Noonan -- The Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), a self-styled "non-profit public interest law and policy center that regularly appears before federal and state courts to promote economic liberty, free enterprise, and a limited and accountable government," filed an amicus curiae brief on September 8th, urging the Federal Circuit to rehear en banc Eli Lilly's appeal of the Court's affirmance of an invalidity finding of U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:33 am
After Bridge v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:43 pm
In UFCW Local 1776 v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:58 am
But in Bridge v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:44 am
United States U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The connection can be based on the residence of the person or a business connection within the territory of a taxing State or a situation within the State of the money or property from which the taxable income is derived;(vi) TDS provisions which are in the nature of machinery provisions constitute an integrated Code under the Act of 1961 together with charging provisions. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:10 pm
Highlights this week included: CAFC: Disclosure that merely allows PHOSITA to ‘envision’ the claimed invention fails written description: Goeddel v Sugano (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) Evista (Raloxifene) – US: CAFC upholds decision against Teva: Eli Lilly & Co v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc (Patent Docs) (The IP Factor) Aranesp (Darbepoetin) – EU: ECJ says ‘no’ to Kirin Amgen,… [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
(Cassirer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm
– state of research and development of new drugs in Indian pharma industry (Spicy IP) US: The Financial Times’ take on gene patenting (Patent Docs) US: Seattle Biotech companies fight over allegedly similar names: Mirina Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:54 pm
Eli Lilly; • Drafting of Second Medical Use Claims after G2/08: How to ensure that a patent is likely to be valid; • The current state of play for biosimilars in the U.S. and in Europe: Where do... [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:11 am
Eli Lilly & Co., supra, 44 Cal.3d 1103, 1110, 245 Cal.Rptr. 658, 751 P.2d 923 (1988). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 101 F.3d 1196, 1202 (7th Cir. 1996); Class Plaintiffs v. [read post]
