Search for: "Little v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Involvement in an accident going to or from work typically is not job-related for the purposes of receiving workers' compensation benefitsMatter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 2009 NY Slip Op 03088, decided on April 23, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentWhile en route to her job at a prison, Wandell Littles was injured when she was involved in an automobile accident approximately 10 feet from the entrance to the facility. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm
State, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), and Mackey v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
In case you've been living under a rock, there was this little case called Wal-Mart v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
CA6: Conceding RS existed if officer credible means you can't change the argument on appeal to no RS
23 Jul 2012, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:20 am
- And that Dogge was able to copy the work as Teller had not stated that the trick was a copyrighted work. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
A little relaxation. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:28 am
FAR 33.103(d)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 6:53 am
Aeroplate Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 12:08 am
Now comes the first crack in the wall.And who better to explain the implications of the Big E decision than our own appellate superstar Dan Tibbett: Having spent a little time digesting Erlinger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
See [United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
The failure to do so may violate the principles set forth in Brady v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Coakley, is whether the Court’s 2000 decision in Hill v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:34 am
United States, No. 08-192 (S. [read post]
