Search for: "Loving v. Virginia"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 4:24 pm
Virginia. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Second, the court easily dispenses with the state’s tradition argument, citing Loving v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Virginia. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
In 1967, we represented Mildred and Richard Loving in their successful fight to end state bans on inter-racial marriage, in the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:02 pm
Elonis argued that under Virginia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
After all, the Supreme Court is not about to overrule Loving v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
Since the Supreme Court invalidated laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:02 am
Virginia and Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:30 am
When such laws came under legal attack in the 1950s and 1960s, their seeming compatibility with originalism was emphasized by conservatives and segregationists as a justification for courts to uphold them.Since the Supreme Court invalidated laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
Reporting on the petition, Lyle Denniston at SCOTUS Blog comments that: "The Virginia case has special symbolic significance, because that is the state that produced the case of Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
States have been scrapping that rule, and in Rogers v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
The Virginia case has special symbolic significance, because that is the state that produced the case of Loving v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm
On Friday, the state attorney general in Virginia is scheduled to file a third appeal on the issue. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Zubulake v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:44 pm
One is the comparison of challenges to prohibitions on same-sex marriage to challenges against bans on inter-racial marriage, which the Court put off deciding until Loving v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Bostic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
Manor Care Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:29 pm
In short, the court applied strict scrutiny because the Virginia law abridges the fundamental right to marry (see Loving v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
” The federal appeals court ruling in the Virginia case is highly symbolic, because that is the state whose long-standing ban on mixed-race marriages was struck down by the Supreme Court forty-seven years ago, in Loving v. [read post]
