Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 8:38 am
Marcu, receiver-appellee
U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
Veeck v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
” The University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Regulatory Review launches a series of essays on the court’s 2019-20 term, including a piece by Jon Devine and David Henkin on County of Maui v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm
(Full disclosure: one of the authors of this post, Marcus Asner, led this prosecution, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Eclectic Properties East, LLC et. al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
The basic facts of Marcus v Dennis are as follows: In October of 2018, Defendant Marlene Dennis, the owner of Marlene Dennis Design, LLC (“MDD”), operating out of Virginia, entered into a contract to provide design services and the procurement and installation of certain design elements for the Plaintiffs, Gregory and Jamie Marcus, at their Maryland home. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The case is Marcus v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:54 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Karen Marcus of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:13 am
Texas and WWH v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:35 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Karen Marcus of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
In Marcus v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am
” Marcus v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Mensing, pp.166-184 The Online Public or Cybercitizen, Andrew Power, pp.185-195 In Case of Emergency Only: The Difficult Role of Ethics in Small Biotechnological Companies Michael Steinmann and Thomas Potthast, pp.196-203 Reports The Health Law Institute, Tracey M Bailey, pp.204-209 Report on the Technoscience and Regulation Research Unit (TRRU) and the Qualitative Research Commons and Studio (QuRCS), Emily Uhrig, pp.210-215 Book Reviews Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia:… [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 11:01 am
Due to popular demand an extra This is Your Trial show was added in for tonight (not been doing them on Sunday or Monday nights): Janey Godley QC v Jarred Christmas QC. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
”The Supreme Court articulated the standard for competency to be executed in the 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:02 am
Marcus adds another—that class membership is reasonably capable of being ascertained. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court will take up the issue in February in the case of United States v. [read post]
