Search for: "MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE" Results 621 - 640 of 721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am by Joey Fishkin
 Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Zackin and Thurston note, the republican vision of the virtuous debt-ridden farmer was interwoven with ideas of ascriptive hierarchy that identified this farmer as White, male, and prosperous enough to already own land.[5] In addition to the cultural influence of republicanism, DPADR’s answer to the first question also emphasizes the character of the 19th-century American economy and its interaction with political institutions. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Adult AD/HD Support Group of Central New Hampshire (603) 226-6121 North Conway/Carroll County Joanne Duncan White Mountain AD-IN Phone: (603) 356-2714 Autism Autism Society of New Hampshire P.O. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: This paper explores the responses to Judge Sonia Sotomayor as symptomatic of new or inferential racism and sexism, which appears to include people of color and challenges systems of power, but in actuality serves to re-center whiteness and maleness. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
More than most novice justices, Alito has taken bullets for business in the term just ended, most notably for his controversial majority opinion in Ledbetter v. [read post]