Search for: "MATTER OF J W J C"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Appeal by defendant from order entered 9 November 2017 by Judge W. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
C. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
I should perhaps also note that, unlike Michael J. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
Jack W. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Army, The J. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
C 94-4054 CW [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:33 am
We reject this contention because the challenged statements implicate matters of public concern and thereby fall squarely within First Amendment protections…. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 4:35 am
-Adrian J. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
J. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
—San Antonio July 27, 2016, pet. filed) (dissenting opinion by Justice Rebeca C. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Thus, where a grand jury's subpoena, given its overbreadth, would itself violate the privacy interests protected by the Fourth Amendment, `[j]udicial supervision is properly exercised in such cases to prevent the wrong before it occurs. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:25 am
Date 01/24/2007 Governor's Program Governor Program # 1
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date1
01/24/2007
01/24/2007First Act: 01/18/07 referred to ways and meansLast Act: 01/24/07 signed chap.1A3736A
Silver (MS) -- Public employee ethics reform; repealer Same as S 2876 SUMM : Amd S94, Exec L; amd S107, Civ Serv L; rpld S1-c sub (j), rpld & add SS 1-l, 1-m… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
See OB-GYN Assoc., 259 Ga. at 668(2), 386 S.E.2d 146(C). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Subtracting the Schedule J figure from the Schedule I figure resulted i [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Engler, The untaxed king of South Beach: LeBron James and the NBA salary cap, 48 SAN DIEGO LAW REVIEW 601 (2011)Natasha C. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Having found that s. 4(3)(c) of PIPA applied, the adjudicator determined that that the OIPC had no jurisdiction to consider the matter further: [para 22] However, my authority under the Act is to determine whether the collection, use or disclosure of personal information was for journalistic purposes only. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
§ 3.409(c)(Supp. 1944)); see, H.R. [read post]
