Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 621 - 640 of 2,718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the second requirement for allowing a correction in the sense of R 139 is also fulfilled in the present case. [2.1.5] Accordingly, the amendment to formula (I) is allowable under R 139 and does not introduce subject-matter that extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:16 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the present selection of eight substances does not enjoy any priority.Hence the [patent proprietor], when defining the subject-matter of claim 1, has selected the preferred range of from 10 to 40% by weight and combined it with a group of eight substances that has been arbitrarily extracted from the list of eleven substances. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It follows that document D1 takes away the novelty under A 54(3) of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[…] [2.5] Consequently, the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the main request lacks novelty in view of D12. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Figure 10.71 on page 721 shows a system of two columns for separating a three component mixture ABC, where the bottom product of the first column containing B and C is fed to a second column separating these components by distilling off component B. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus the disputed matter (Streitstoff) that is relevant for the appeal proceedings results from the SGA and the corresponding reply. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Rebecca Files on SSRN “Seaboard Report” A/K/A In In the Matter of Gisela de Leon-Meredith (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44969, October 23, 2001) The Impact of Cooperation by Thomas O. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The solution as claimed is, as discussed above, not considered obvious.Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 1 involves an inventive step in the sense of A 56.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.The decision has also been commented on Visae Patentes. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:35 am by Jeff Vail
- Company details (legal name, d/b/a, f/k/a, address, corporate form, state of incorporation, affiliates/subsidiaries/parents)- Insurance information (if applicable)- Key personnel name and contact information (general counsel, relevant outside counsel, appropriate business decision-maker/person with settlement or budgetary authority, risk manager, involved employees, etc.)- Other involved parties (potential defendants, plaintiffs, third-parties, witnesses, etc.)- What… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:49 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 5,903,803 (the ‘803 patent) and 6,128,454 (the ‘454 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Clover Holdings, Inc. of Hoffman Estates, Illinois Clover Technologies Group, LLC d/b/a Depot International f/k/a Depot America f/k/a Image1 Products of Ottawa, Illinois Clover Vietnam Co., Ltd. of Vietnam Dataproducts USA, LLC of Thousand Oaks, California Dataproducts Imaging Solutions S.A. de C.V. of Mexico CAU, Inc. d/b/a… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A computer implemented method for determining of key pairs for an RSA encryption or signature method bycalculating the modular inverse (R) of a value (E) in relation to a module (M) by means of the following steps: a) determining (10) a breakdown of the module (M) into at least two factors P-1 and Q-1, wherein P and Q are the prime numbers that are defined by RSA,b) calculating (12,14) a respective auxiliary value (R1, R2) for each of the factors (P-1,Q-1) determined in step a), wherein… [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” First, the court of appeals reversed the dismissal of the complaint under Rule 9(b). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:18 am by Brian Hall
§ 2701 et. seq.; 2) violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (a/k/a the Wiretap Act), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Quinta Jurecic
                  Thank you for your attention to this matter. [read post]