Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 621 - 640 of 120,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 2:02 pm
 Made sense.But the more I think about it, the more I think that the Court of Appeal may actually be wrong. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:15 am by Michael Woodward
However, when selling or licensing the patented products, a patent owner may inadvertently extinguish potential revenue streams associated with the complementary use cases due to the doctrine of patent exhaustion. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 6:41 am
Nicole Stelle Garnett (Notre Dame Law School) has posted Planning as Public Use? [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:25 am by Christopher Wilson
The Use of Variants The Registrar of Trademarks may cancel a trademark registration if it has not been used in the preceding three years. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 4:25 am by Christopher Wilson
The Use of Variants The Registrar of Trademarks may cancel a trademark registration if it has not been used in the preceding three years. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:36 am
Satyam Computer Services Ltd v Upaid Systems Ltd Court of Appeal “It would only be through the use of the clearest possible specific language that parties to a settlement would be taken to have excluded fraud-based claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:42 pm by Liisa Speaker
” While newly discovered evidence may be used for impeachment to grant a retrial the evidence must do more than impeach. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:15 am
On the Daubert issue, the only one on which the Court reverses the Nacchio verdict, it ironically relies on a case (Goebel v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 2:55 am
" On May 18, 2016, the Second Circuit in International Systems Security Certification Consortium v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:45 pm
  The district court uses only a calculation of 263 grams, and then it downwardly departs to result in a sentence of less than half the lowest guideline range. [read post]