Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State" Results 621 - 640 of 906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm by Joey Fishkin
  But anyway it was the main line of attack and the main justification for states' resistance to implementing the law. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
This post gives some of the background and summarizes the main points of the decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am by familoo
On 2 April I was contacted by Jonathan Ledger, General Secretary of Napo. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Derek Dissinger
Sebelius, Secretary, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al, gripped a good part of the nation in anticipation. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Welcomed with great satisfaction by the FIFA secretary general Jerome Valcke, the bill will create a sub-system of law limited in time and space, but, more importantly, which will be entirely determined by the need for the state to respect the private agreement concluded between the Brazilian Government and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, and by the interest of this latter not to breach the agreement just concluded with Anheuser-Busch, the… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
On March 18, 1999, the articles of incorporation were filed with the Alabama secretary of state. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
The Court’s reasoning The appellant relied upon the Court of Appeal decision in Hockenjos v Secretary of State for Social Security [2004] EWCA Civ 1749, [2005] EuLR 385 in which it was held that the denial of child supplements to a father’s jobseeker’s allowance where he and the mother shared roughly equal care of the children was unjustified indirect discrimination. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In finding the measures to be proportionate, the Court distinguished the case of Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence in which the Court quashed a byelaw preventing camping next to the Aldermaston nuclear site. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]