Search for: "Matter of Application of Graham"
Results 621 - 640
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
., a Florida based intellectual property law firm and has focused his practice exclusively on matters relating to patent, trademark, and copyright law for the past 12 years. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
Graham v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
S. 303 (1980), the District Court held that the subject matter covered by § 101 clearly includes plant life.... [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:08 pm
He said there have been two instances of plagiarism and one instance of fraud in a law school application. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
A great blessing no matter how you slice it. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Under Ethics Rule 1.4, lawyers must keep clients "reasonably informed about the status of a matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
If an invention was either known or used in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in the US or a foreign country, then the subject matter of the patent application is considered to be "anticipated" as information already in the public domain, and not a scientific advancement. [1] But what if the invention is known and used in a foreign nation, but not patented or described in a printed publication? [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:56 am
They have been developed as a matter of internal Office management and are not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party against the Office. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 9:31 pm
Graham v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
(Indeed, as Jack describes the internal administration disagreements over applicable legal principles, and political strategies about whether to seek further congressional support, it appears to me clear that Jack Goldsmith is Exhibit A for those who hold these concerns: Jack's posture toward congressional statutes like the War Powers Resolution and FISA is to regard them as setting strong presumptive limits on presidential power, rather than Youngstown-Category-I "safe… [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:05 pm
GRAHAM, Mr. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
Graham v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
Ct. 1989 (2007) (search did not violate Fourth Amendment where search warrant executed on home despite its sale four months prior and search discontinued within reasonable time); Graham v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Dudas (06/28/2007): appeal of district court's decision that compliance with MPEP § 2163.06(I)(B) is insufficient to establish a prima facie case and shift the burden to the applicant (reversed); discussion of several continuation applications, dating back to the 1970's, all based on the same specification; during prosecution, the applicant withdrew all claims, submitted over 1,100 new claims, and the examiner rejected the claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The Court stated that the Graham v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The CAFC noted that Pfizer had simply failed in this matter to prove that the results were unexpected. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:40 pm
Texas Tech Professor Ann Graham over at Banking Law Prof Blog has some tough words for purveyors "liar loans. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The PTO examines every patent application for obviousness. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
Graham, 383 U.S., at 17, 86 S. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Its application of the test ultimately concluded to the combination of the pedal taught in U.S. [read post]
