Search for: "Matter of L. v P." Results 621 - 640 of 2,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Suggests move from copyright to copy-privilege: move from P to D. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The following evidence inter alia was cited in opposition proceedings:D1: WO 02/15713D2: EP 0949329D3: DE 10163964D6: WO 02/051873D9: WO 95/21240D10: WO 97/29179D15: WO 96/22366D17: WO 00/70064D18: Kunze, "Technology Brewing and Malting", VLB Berlin, 1996, p. 83-87.The following evidence was filed with the appellant's statement setting out the grounds of appeal:D19: Excerpt from Südzucker Handbuch, "Erfrischungsgetränke", 2000D20: Leitsatz für… [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
Article 122 of the PACTE bill proposes to extend the grounds for rejection 4°, 5° and 7° of Article L. 612-12 as follows: (4°)     its subject matter is not patentable pursuant to Articles L. 611-16 to L. 611-19[9]; (5°)     its subject matter cannot be considered as an “invention” within the meaning of paragraph 2 of Article L. 611-10 (discoveries, aesthetic creations,… [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
Even If Chalking Were a Search, It Is Reasonable as a Matter of Law California public agencies wishing to defend their chalking procedures may also argue that chalking without a warrant is reasonable as a matter of law notwithstanding City of Saginaw. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cooper, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 146, at p. 159). [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
Director Pay Posted by Kosmas Papadopoulos, ISS Analytics, on Monday, May 6, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director compensation, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Long-Term value, Ownership, Pay for performance, Peer groups, Surveys Corporate Board Practices in the S&P 500 and Russell 3000: 2019 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, Inc., on Tuesday, May 7, 2019 … [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]