Search for: "May v. Anderson" Results 621 - 640 of 2,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 14, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Simoniz USA, Inc., Serial No. 87865135 [Section 2(d) refusal of SIMONIZ CERAMICSHIELD for "Paint sealant for exterior surfaces of vehicle" in view of the registered mark PLATINUM CERAMIC SHIELD for "“Clear coating protectant containingceramic nanoparticles for use on vehicles" [CERAMIC disclaimed].October 20, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Carolyn… [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Here, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s untimely motion for a hearing to suppress evidence because he did not explain why the motion could not have been made sooner, pursuant to CPL 255.20 and the court’s rulings in the cases of Payton v New York, People v Greaves and People v Anderson. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
Here’s the Supreme Court’s articulation of the (fairly malleable) test in Anderson v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:15 pm
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled on May 15 in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:12 am
  The June cases are as follows: Anderson & Associates of Virginia, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Anderson was instrumental in developing Tesla's auto-pilot system and allegedly downloaded a number of documents to his laptop upon departing Tesla for Aurora Innovation. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Harleen Gambhir surveyed the growing list of groups affiliated with the Islamic State that may come under the scope of the 2001 AUMF. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Victoria Clark
In May of 2018, Scott Anderson and Wittes filed a lawsuit against the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act to gain access to the results of the FBI’s latest internal “climate survey. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Kevin Gatlin, No. 99,091 (Anderson)Direct appeal (petition for review); Aggravated batteryDarrell L. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
Rotenberg discussed 'the risks and limitations of a mandatory Internet ID that may be favored by some as a way to address the risk of cyber attack.' He explained how such a proposal would implicate human rights and online freedom, and questioned the constitutionality of such a measure. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:03 pm
Div. 1960) ("the alleged fraudulent representation must relate to some past or presently existing fact and cannot ordinarily be predicated on matters in futuro"); Anderson v. [read post]