Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 621 - 640 of 824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Gore Does Not Suck Buckley is Dead, Long Live Buckley: The New Campaign Finance Incoherence of McConnell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Michael McConnell has made a prominent originalist argument defending Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
But marriage is primarily a creature of state law, and states differ as to who may marry. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
Steve Calabresi and Julia Rickert's new article, Originalism and Sex Discrimination, attempts to do for the 1970s sex equality decisions what Michael McConnell's 1995 article, "Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions," did for Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:41 pm
McConnell, Richard and Frances Mallery Professor of Law, Stanford Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School and former Judge, U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Michael McConnell writes: “Such is the moral authority of [Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm by Kedar
The Court may simply be trying to avoid a repeat of McConnell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Sam Favate
The proposed amendment would also reverse the 1976 decision Buckley v Valeo, which held that spending money is a form of speech in elections. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
   She mentioned, in particular, the massive test case (12 separate appeals) in 2003, involving the constitutionality of major provisions of a 2002 federal campaign finance regulation law (McConnell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am by Lyle Denniston
    The Court accepted the appeals — under the general title, McConnell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am by Rick Hasen
   I have also enjoyed working with Bob and Tracy on some projects, including some pro bono amicus briefs in the Supreme Court (including in McConnell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:54 pm by Paul Horwitz
 (To that we might add the point made by Abner Greene, Michael McConnell, and others: that the Religion Clauses disadvantage religion too, in some ways. [read post]