Search for: "Money v. USA"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360) US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am
In Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Particularly, Commissioner Chopra asserted that Commissioners Phillips and Wilson “do not support serious consequences for Made in USA fraud and have expressed support for the longstanding permissive policy of the past,” including support for “no-money, no-fault settlements. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:25 am
” Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
Last Term, in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:22 pm
That’s the hot, exciting subject of Wednesday’s Nevada federal district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
To the contrary, and unlike the situation [under the previously applicable rules],[v] the Legislator has expanded the concept of enforceable titles (al-sanadat al-tanfidhiyya),[vi] which now includes criminal judgments involving restitution (radd), compensations (ta’widhat), fines (gharamat) and other civil rights (huquq madaniyyah). [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
For example, in Murphy v U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Not only is the large sum of money at play an issue, but coaches pondering an in-contract coaching move could be deterred by the mess that has become West Virginia University v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Santander Consumer USA, Inc, appellants contend that because they were not collecting a debt for another, they were not debt collectors under the ACT. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
So we’ll rely on our discussions there:First, this kind of liability is contrary to the fundamental legal tenet that manufacturers’ are supposed to be liable because they made money putting the injurious product on the market:Well, [branded liability] is an end run around the heart of modern product liability, which was created . [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
Likewise, in Dall v St. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, the smart money is counting Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Smart money says the USOC will file a motion to dismiss and the court will throw the case out without hearing it. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
See also Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
