Search for: "Moore Holdings Inc." Results 621 - 640 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– CTIA’s opposition to DMCA exemptions proposed by EFF and Wireless Alliance (EFF)   US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit upholds ruling finding editor of 2600 magazine violated anti-trafficking provision of the DMCA by linking to DeCSS hosting sites (Media Wonk)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Authors’ Guild asserts Amazon’s Kindle device that reads book you have purchased… [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
As such, a final holding in the parallel court proceeding will end an ongoing IPX. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Inquiry on Data Collection - nyti.ms/JoMCd9 (David Streitfeld) Implementing a Litigation Hold | Kelley Drye - bit.ly/HzTaWA (PDF) (Nicolas Panarella, Wook Kim) In Electronic Discovery, Poorly Done Demands Can Become Million Dollar Mistakes – bit.ly/HBtF8C (Lauren Cannataro) Kleen Products vs Da Silva Moore: Measurement vs Method - bit.ly/HMCgJz (Greg Buckles) Leading Federal Court Decision Opens Doors to Wider Use of Computer-Assisted Review… [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Thus, we affirm the district court . . . . 08a0597n.06 Peno Trucking Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Continuing the tradition of a unanimous ruling for a first opinion, the decision in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
But this analysis is not correct; to the extent Wheelerso holds, it fails to properly protect the First Amendment rights of nonmedia speakers. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
But this analysis is not correct; to the extent Wheelerso holds, it fails to properly protect the First Amendment rights of nonmedia speakers. [read post]