Search for: "Moore v. State Bar" Results 621 - 640 of 717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court's 2003 ruling that state laws penalizing private consensual adult "sodomy" are unconstitutional, the unrepealed Alabama sodomy law was invoked to break up a lesbian household in the context of alimony litigation in J.L.M. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(Thanks to Kristina Moore for assistance in collecting the filings for the list.) [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Moore Federal Appellate Court Decisions Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here1st Circuit Casamento v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
State of Ohio     Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0737n.06  Heartwood v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION WAYNE TOMPKINS, Petitioner, Case No. 8:08-cv-2212-T-23MAP v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
App. 1979) (a federal decision supports case-by-case).Iowa: Moore v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]