Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
” Obama’s lawyer had attempted to quash a subpoena that requires the President to appear personally, but that motion has been denied by Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:42 pm
Boston College’s Motion to Quash (First Subpoena). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
A judge must now answer that question after hearing arguments regarding a motion to quash a witness subpoena for the wife’s attorney Esther Panitch. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
According to BC’s second motion to quash, the subpoena called for: Original audio and visual recordings of “any and all interviews containing information about the abduction and death of Mrs. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:55 pm
Interesting report from Advance Indiana. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
Dec. 21, 2011) Overview: A DC Magistrate Judge recently ruled that a defendant cannot file anonymous motions to quash disclosure subpoenas in copyright file-sharing case. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm
Third—and this is a question I’ve had for a while—I am wondering why the parties with real standing, the interviewees themselves, have not sought to quash the subpoenas. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The Boston College Subpoena blog has posted the transcript of a radio interview with Anthony McIntyre, one of the forces behind Project Belfast and one of the unsuccessful intervenors in the proceedings here in Boston aimed at quashing the government’s subpoena to Boston College. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:42 am
Beginning its discussion, the court first identified the appropriate considerations when addressing a motion to quash or modify a Rule 45 subpoena: 1) the relevance of the discovery sought, 2) the requesting party’s need, and 3) the potential hardship to the party subject to the subpoena. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
G.A.T., JR., Appellee. 2nd District.Public employees -- Drug testing -- Discovery -- Subpoena duces tecum -- Non-profit advocacy organization moved to quash subpoenas for documents in connection with action challenging constitutionality of mandatory drug testing of state employees -- Motion to quash is denied in part with respect to documents that are publicly available on the organization's website and responsive to defendant's request --… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:45 pm
(Aaron drafted, and is responsible for, the substantive motion to quash subpoenas linked above.) [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm
’ ‘Did the judge grant your motion to quash the subpoena? [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:15 pm
Organon’s (collectively, “Merck”) motion to quash subpoenas ad testificandum and duces tecum directed to Dr. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
IP Nav then filed a motion to quash the subpoena in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, arguing that the subpoena was invalid for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:31 pm
This Court DENIES the motions of the Trustees of Boston College to quash the commissioner’s subpoenae, and GRANTS Boston College’s request for in camera review of materials responsive to the subpoenae to the Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
Young denied BC’s motion to quash the subpoena. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm
When the manufacturer turned over to the Commission documents and data sets relating to its condom business with the information on other products redacted, it petitioned the Commission either to limit or to quash the subpoena and the CID. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm
In October, however, the lower court denied Rockstar05's motion to quash the subpoena, providing time for defendant to lodge an interlocatory appeal, and allowing an amicus [various media organizations] to intervene in the case.Rocktar05 has appealed Judge Canady's decision relative to the subpoena. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
" The court held that: A court lacks jurisdiction over a non-party and the authority to require the non-party to appear for deposition where she has not been served with the deposition subpoena....The filing of the motion for protective order, seeking to quash or limit the deposition, was defensive and not a claim for affirmative relief that resulted in a waiver of the claim of lack of service and personal jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
BC has moved to quash the subpoenas. [read post]
