Search for: "Mounts v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
” Bissonnette v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
The problem is a practical one: the painting is mounted on a wall, and removing it is almost certain to cause damage. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
Paul, Minnesota, and Mount Holly Township, New Jersey. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
That man is now on the verge of swearing a solemn oath to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am
The Defendant filed a federal trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in May of 2011 to register the “Terrible T-Shirt” phrase as a trademark for use on T-Shirts. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
In Saskatchewan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
(IPKat) Next lap in Force India vs Ethiad dispute (IPKat) United States US General US election brings IP uncertainty (IP Watch) US Patent Reform Patent Reform still on the table (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Bond’s gun a hit at the USPTO (IPKat) Regional patent office coming to a city near you? [read post]
11 May 2025, 8:58 am
Warrington's team argued both that the President was not an "Officer of the United States" and did not hold an "Office under the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Newsmax apologizes for airing false allegations against Dominion worker, who drops company from suit”. [read post]
