Search for: "Murray v. Murray" Results 621 - 640 of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
Conrad Murray was hired to care for MJ and make sure he was present and alert for preparations MJ died after Murray administered lethal dose of anesthetic propofol (which was intended to help MJ sleep) Civil Suit (Katherine Jackson et al v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
here, the "political divisiveness along religious lines" argument in church-state law has always been wrong: Nearly thirty-five years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Jason Murray, who is representing Republican voters who want to disqualify Trump. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority" (Conrad v Regan, 175 AD2d 629, 629-630 [4th Dept 1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 860 [1991]; see NY Const, art VIII, §1; Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d 267, 269 [3d Dept 1975], lv denied 37 NY2d 707 [1975]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority" (Conrad v Regan, 175 AD2d 629, 629-630 [4th Dept 1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 860 [1991]; see NY Const, art VIII, §1; Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d 267, 269 [3d Dept 1975], lv denied 37 NY2d 707 [1975]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority" (Conrad v Regan, 175 AD2d 629, 629-630 [4th Dept 1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 860 [1991]; see NY Const, art VIII, §1; Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d 267, 269 [3d Dept 1975], lv denied 37 NY2d 707 [1975]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" This language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority" (Conrad v Regan, 175 AD2d 629, 629-630 [4th Dept 1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 860 [1991]; see NY Const, art VIII, §1; Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d 267, 269 [3d Dept 1975], lv denied 37 NY2d 707 [1975]). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In the court's view, the inmates' claim was governed by Murray v. [read post]
The question of reasonable expectation of privacy is determined by reference to non-exhaustive Murray factors (Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am by Matthew Lerner
 Between Panels, the Third Department is inconsistent as to the sole proximate cause defense (a point discussed in the next post regarding Murray v. [read post]