Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
New York Yankee, Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
For example, the Eastern District of Texas, which covers a largely rural portion of Texas, emerged as a focal point for patent litigation in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:22 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
In Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, No. 15 C 7755, United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The CAT, then, is not just an element of Ohio’s revenue structure; it has emerged as the focal point of an emerging national debate over the role, if any, of gross receipts taxes in a modern tax code. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
JMA argued that the first factor’s focus was not necessarily application of law, but rather the national interest in the sense of the interests of the national and domestic oil and gas industry, as well as to royalty owners throughout the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Bruce Church, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
In particular, the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), granting Congress the power: “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Unlike the Directive, which had to be transposed in national law by member states’ parliaments over a period of years, the GDPR has direct effect across the Union. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 7:58 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
