Search for: "Oakes v. Oakes" Results 621 - 640 of 1,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2022, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
WWE 2K Videogame Doesn’t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players–Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games Copyright and Tattoos: Hangover II Injunction Denied, But the Copyright Owner Got Some Good News Too–Whitmill v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
  This was a guy who ran for a seat on the Thousand Oaks City Council. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:14 am
Anyway, I thought it was funny that Justice Johnson thought it necessary to go on at length about the justification for this particular rule.I'm not going to even talk about the irony that arises out of the fact that Justice Johnson's unnecessary policy defense of a rule that allegedly results in killing fewer trees actually ends up killing a lot of trees since it takes up a page or so of a published opinion, a page subsequently replicated in thousands of advance sheets, paper copies, and… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by privacylawyer
This is called the Oakes test, from a 1986 decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Crown, Cork & Seal Co., No. 06-0714 Pine Oak Builders v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 103 R. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
AbbottIn the opinion of the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, (California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am by Aaron Lindstrom
City of Royal Oak, Estate of Jilek v Stockson, and In re Hon. [read post]