Search for: "P. Rogers" Results 621 - 640 of 1,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 4:16 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Statement suppressed.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:02 am
Trial court incorrectly denied based on ground that def opposed the motion, erred in failing to conduct a Richardson hearing, although ASA did not learn of it until week before the trial knowledge to police was imputed to the state.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:16 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Was not necessary for jury's understanding of officers encounter with the defendant.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Fact that def's drivers license and a letter addressed to him were found on or in cardbox box containing men's clothing and sandwich bag containing drugs insufficient to establish dominion and control over contraband where evidence did not show the cottage was def's residence or suggest how many others have visited or used cottage and did not prove who owned the clothes in the open box.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Good language is not the defense duty to rehabilitate the juror and reasonable doubt is not overcome by the juror's silence to a question later to the whole panel as to that general issue.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:33 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Statute, 893.07(4) requiring pharmacists to maintain controlled substance records, including prescription records, and to make records available for inspection and copying by police does not violate constitutional privacy provisions under the Florida constitution, Carter 23 So. 3rd 798(1 DCA 2009).The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Trial judge stated and implied that def would have received lesser sentence if pled prior to jury selection, and it appears that not all the discussion with the judge about the plea was on the record.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:45 am
., 33 FLW 2365, 4th DCA, trial court erred when it relied on mother's prior inconsistent statement to deputy as sole evidence supporting its finding of guilt on simple assault charge-deputy's testimony as to mother's statements cannot be used to support finding of guilt because those statements were not given under oath at trial, hearing or other proceedingKessler, 33 FLW 2378, 4th DCA, Statements of the defendant-error to admit into evidence a tape recording of a phone call def made… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:17 am
Error to allow primary detective to testify before he received a warrant for def's arrest for murder, he had ruled out self-defense-error for ofc to give lay opinion not harmless where could not show no reasonable possibility that the testimony affected the verdictRimes 33 FLW 2562, 5th DCA, error to deny challenge for cause who had a close friend who worked as a deputy sheriff and who stated he would tend to believe a police ofc over a lay witness-after brought back into the courtroom alone… [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
DHSMV, 34 FLW 520, DUI, Adm review of suspension - licensee was denied due process when hearing officer failed to issue subpoena for individuals who inspected breath test, although inspection reports authored by these individuals were received in evidence and considered by the hearing officer in sustaining the license suspension - circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in concluding the hearing officer did not have the authority to issue subpoenasThe Law Offices of… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:25 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  New trial, Harmful error.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:10 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
The ofc did not see drugs or money, or see a hand to hand transaction.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:57 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  This is a good summary of the case law in this area.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:03 am
Rogers wrote (p. 8), referring to a 1995 report, "only the United States prints bills that are identical in size and color in all denominations. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:56 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Tape was not admissible as a past recollection recorded where witness was unable or unwilling to attest to the accuracy of the tape recorded conversation.D.B.P. 35 FLW 629, 5th DCA, search and seizure/ stop and frisk: Juvenile's act of putting his hands in his pocket during a stop for a non-criminal infraction in a high crime area was not sufficient to provide reasonable suspicion to justify the pat down.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:11 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
No evidence that the vehicle driven by LEO had contained agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings, court should have directed a verdict to the lesser included offense.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:37 am
., 34 FLW 261, 2nd DCA, error to deny motion to suppress marijuana found on juvenile after arrest for riding a bicycle without a bell, in violation of a city ordinance-traffic offenses related to bicycles are noncriminal violations subject to only civil penalties and individual cannot be arrested for violating a bicycle-related city ordinance-equivalent ordinance previously found unlawful by Florida Supreme CourtSinquefield, 34 FLW 262, 2nd DCA, Lawful execution of legal duty-police not engaged in… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:00 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
Fact that car and license plate from an area that ofcs considered high in narcotic activity and difference between names on hotel registration and on license did not give reasonable belief that drug activity was afoot.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:44 am by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Evidence was not necessary to describe events that took place after car was stopped and defendant fled, justification for the pursuit was not a material fact in dispute.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]