Search for: "PATEL v. PATEL" Results 621 - 640 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
However, in any event, Rose J also took into consideration that it would neither be contrary to the public interest nor harmful to the integrity of the legal system to allow the claim to proceed (following the test for illegality set out in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42): The purpose of the prohibition on breach of fiduciary duty is to protect companies from becoming the victim of the wrongful exercise of power by their officers. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Court also makes an important observation regarding the High Court’s unjustified encroachment upon the arbitral tribunal’s competence.Interim award and jurisdiction under section 16 – interim award can be challenged separately and independently under section 34, and arbitral tribunal’s authority to rule on its own jurisdiction is restricted and specificM/S Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-Operative Limited v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Natalma M. McKnew
A glimmer of optimism might be found in 7-Eleven’s very recent (September 10th) escape from a misclassification suit in Massachusetts, Patel v. 7-Eleven. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am by Anthony Fairclough
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Times has agreed to apologies and  pay damages to Iman Abdullah Patel. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]