Search for: "PATTERSON v. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Yesterday, in Magwood v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:06 pm
Surrogate Nahman reasoned that “the validity of same-sex marriages has not been definitively determined by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (see Funderburke v New York State Dep’t. of Civ. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:30 am
Schering-Plough Corp., December 11, 2017, Patterson, A.). [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:06 am
Related Blog Posts A Few Things You Should Know About Underinsured/Uninsured Motorist Coverage After a Car Wreck Texas Court Remands Fraud Case Arising from 18-Wheeler Wrongful Death Lawsuit – Patterson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Patterson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:21 am
In Utility Center, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
Patterson. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm
(Forbes Cross-Post) Social Media Rant Against Airline Employee Wasn’t Defamatory But May Be False Light–Patterson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:07 am
In another First Department case, Patterson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
The case, called Patterson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
See, e.g., Schlesinger v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
The Court reviews Squeo v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
”Patterson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
The ZBA's recognition that the alternative uses of the cellar were limited, essentially, to being a showroom or a storage area, "merely stated the obvious" (Matter of Merlotto v Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 AD3d at 930) as to this factor. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
The ZBA's recognition that the alternative uses of the cellar were limited, essentially, to being a showroom or a storage area, "merely stated the obvious" (Matter of Merlotto v Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 AD3d at 930) as to this factor. [read post]
