Search for: "Park v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 11,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:28 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:28 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
CLIENT ALERT: Price v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
Supreme Court refuses to consider filmmaker's appeal Price v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 3:00 am
The Microsoft Litigation's Lessons for United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
Workplace Mass Shootings Are A Reminder That Employers Need Legally Compliant Workplace Gun Policies
9 May 2023, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"21 NYCRR 1401.7(c) provides that a FOIL request is deemed denied if there is no response to the request within five business days (Matter of Madden v Village of Tuxedo Park, 192 AD3d 802); 4. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"21 NYCRR 1401.7(c) provides that a FOIL request is deemed denied if there is no response to the request within five business days (Matter of Madden v Village of Tuxedo Park, 192 AD3d 802); 4. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm
Parcels on the peninsula, which also is home to Fort Trumbull State Park, have been vacant for almost 20 years. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:58 pm
City of Burlington v Sisters & Brothers Investment Group, LLP, 2023 WL 3262648 (VT 5/5/2023) [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:13 pm
(Johnson v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
Under State v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]