Search for: "Paul Rosenzweig"
Results 621 - 640
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 12:16 pm
The Washington Post reports that President Obama is considering leaving a standing U.S. force of 5,000 troops in Afghanistan beyond 2016. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:33 pm
One camp, personified by Paul Rosenzweig, argues cyber changes everything. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am
” Paul Rosenzweig expressed intense relief after the White House declared that the United States and China agreed not to “conduct or knowingly support cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property, including trade secrets or other confidential business information, with the intent of providing competitive advantages to companies or commercial sectors. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:10 am
I’m not quite as pessimistic as Paul Rosenzweig, but color me a bit skeptical as well. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 6:35 am
” Paul Rosenzweig linked to the transcript of the oral argument. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 11:34 am
Earlier today, the Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed Russian military presence in Syria, claiming that military experts were assisting in the delivery of arms shipments aimed at combatting terrorism in the country. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 9:43 pm
Thursday, September 10th at 1:30 pm: James Jay Carafano will host an event featuring Paul Rosenzweig, David Shedd, Sebastian Gorka, and Steve Moore on the 10th Anniversary of Winning the Long War. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am
” Speaking of Chinese hacks, Paul Rosenzweig asked the Office of Personnel Management, “where’s my letter? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am
Tanks returned to Tiananmen Square earlier today, but this time to celebrate an ascendant China as well as the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
Cyber: Paul Rosenzweig and Ben announced the winner of Lawfare’s Most Interesting Database to Hack Contest. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
Paul Rosenzweig asks: Coincidence or Lawfare readers in our midst? [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
Paul Rosenzweig then piled on a few more possible databases the Chinese are eyeing: data related to reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission sensitive information database; the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission filings; drivers' license files in the 50 States; and just for fun, he says, the scientific research at our Universities. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
Paul Rosenzweig then piled on a few more possible databases the Chinese are eyeing: data related to reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission sensitive information database; the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission filings; drivers' license files in the 50 States; and just for fun, he says, the scientific research at our Universities. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:09 pm
Reports indicate that longtime Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar is dead… yet again. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am
Paul Rosenzweig joined the fun and added “a few more [databases] that a good Chinese spy ought to look at. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
The Keys Under Doormats report was quickly followed up by activity in the blogosphere by very thoughtful technologist (and paper contributor) Susan Landau, researchers like Benjamin Wittes, and former policymakers like Paul Rosenzweig. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:17 pm
Paul proposes a simple rule -- "encryption providers may be required to adopt a government sponsored "back door" technology if, and only if, the methodology for that technology has been published publicly for more than 12 months and no efforts to subvert or defeat it have been successful. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare As part of Lawfare’s coverage of the ongoing encryption debate, Paul Rosenzweig brought us a modest proposal for testing encryption insecurity. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Check out recent posts from Susan Landau, Paul Rosenzweig, and FBI Director James Comey.) [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 7:00 am
Paul Rosenzweig argued that “the Patel court’s decision to permit a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Los Angeles inn-keeper records ordinance makes it more likely that a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Section 702 program will be heard. [read post]
