Search for: "Payne v. Payne"
Results 621 - 640
of 718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2009, 3:02 am
Among the other contributors is our colleague Cymie Payne, about whom we posted a while back. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:44 pm
It’s my on the road v. at home ratio for the last two weeks. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:14 pm
Payne, Alabama. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 20; and the precedent has "been questioned by Members of th[is] Court in later decisions, and [has] defied consistent application by the lower courts," Payne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:47 pm
The Court hasn’t opined on this subject since the 1991 case of Payne v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:13 pm
Spence Payne Masington v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:36 am
Payne; while Foster had held that sentences handed down under the statutes found unconstitutional in that decision were void, the court reversed course in Payne and held them to be merely voidable. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Again, Payne v Cooper is cited in support. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:24 pm
There is a lot that is of interest in the judgment, including an intriguing apparently obiter suggestion of repairing duties to tolerated trespassers and a partial vindication of James Stark on Payne v Cooper (Hi James!). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
That changed in Payne v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:22 pm
The Nov. 5th Court of Appeals decision in the case of Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of J.M. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
And in 1991, in Payne v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:14 pm
In the new "victim impact" cases, Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the Court has not reviewed that type of evidence since its ruling 17 years ago in Payne v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:29 pm
In April 2007, it posted the police video of a high-speed car chase that was important in the Court's resolution of Scott v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 4:44 pm
California (07-11073) and Zamudio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
In the new “victim impact” cases, Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the Court has not reviewed that type of evidence since its ruling 17 years ago in Payne v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:44 am
"The test, under the existing Supreme Court case law -- from Payne v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
It's an appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 1:32 am
- Denver attorney Stan V. [read post]
