Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 621 - 640
of 7,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
Vaile v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
As many people understand, child support is always modifiable. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 9:42 pm
The opinion in US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:43 am
Background The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 received Royal Assent on 27 March 2014. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am
The Court of Appeal agreed that the existing, case-by-case approach recommended in V v T should be adopted, and that trust variation approval cases were different from settlement approval cases such as JX MX (A Child) v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust (above). [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:27 pm
The case, R.R. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:37 pm
The People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:25 pm
That could have helped the defendant in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:43 am
However, there are limits to the privilege as illustrated by today's decision by the Third Department in People v Powers, 2007 NY Slip Op 06181. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:52 pm
Florida law has always been clear that married people or one unmarried adult can adopt a child. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Department of Child Safety (Indian Child Welfare Act – Expert Witnesses)People in Interest of E.T. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether indigent people are entitled to legal representation during child support proceedings. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
See Weisberg v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
Most people aren't in favor of terrorist attacks, or not preventing them. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
Bogner – Indiana Supreme Court Weighs Child Support Modification, May 30, 2015, Highland Divorce Lawyer Blog The post Nordness v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The Court of Appeal held that there was an objective and reasonable justification for treating Mrs Carmichael less favourably than a child in the same situation, as the best interests of the child had to be a primary consideration. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal,… [read post]
