Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 621 - 640
of 34,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2007, 11:22 am
I don't care how a legal theory might be articulated in a good test case. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
And, among other things, recall seeing the Canoga Park Wienerschnitzel -- a chain, among others, of which this East Coast boy had never heard a peep.Based upon this (admittedly long-ago) experience, I can say fairly confidently that it surprised me not in the least that there were multiple gang-related murders at this establishment.Check out the opinion for a fairly good discussion (by both the majority and the dissent) of the nature of gangs in the modern era as well as the legal… [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
For reasons that are not at all surprising given both the nature of this institution as well as the facts underlying the sentence.This is not to assert, by the way, that the California Supreme Court in the post-Bird era is totally incapable of exercising detached legal judgment in death penalty cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
My strong sense is that, in such a case, this panel would not view the entry as de minimus but would instead uphold the imprisonment of the defendant for many years.But what's illegal and unreasonable for individuals is perhaps legal and right for police officers. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:42 pm
The decision varies from In Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (ACN 004 551 473) v Amcor Limited (ACN 000 017 372)[2008] FCA 88 in which the Federal Court rejected the ACCC's claim for legal professional privilege and public interest immunity privilege in relation to 111 witness statements drafted by ACCC investigators in connection with the ACCC proceedings against Visy . [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:04 am
Wills v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:04 pm
This post examines the legal reasoning and practical results of Dobbs. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
Perhaps not from a legal standpoint, but just as a matter of fairness and settled expectations. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
Earlier this week, the Michigan Court of Appeals held in People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
“The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 140 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2016]; CPLR 2221[e]). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:11 am
At the same time, the broad legal issue â€â [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Restraining orders are legal orders that protect a person or multiple people from another person. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
Forming legal rules governing cyberspace Appendix. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am
Related Posts: Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am
Black, Jr. helped Thurgood Marshall of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc. to write the legal brief for Linda Brown, a 10-year-old student in Topeka, Kansas, whose historic case, Brown v. [read post]
