Search for: "People v Legall" Results 621 - 640 of 31,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2022, 2:04 pm by Apple Payne Law PLLC
This post examines the legal reasoning and practical results of Dobbs. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sultan v Zhu 2020 NY Slip Op 01285 Decided on February 25, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department is the story of a group of people living in a small condominium building. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 11:24 am by Eric Goldman
Related Posts: Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
"The point is this:  Yes, it'd be remarkably random for Wear to interject in a text fight about flirting with people over Facebook that he intended to kill some random guy not involved at all in the whole Facebook dispute. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 140 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2016]; CPLR 2221[e]). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Black, Jr. helped Thurgood Marshall of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc. to write the legal brief for Linda Brown, a 10-year-old student in Topeka, Kansas, whose historic case, Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
The People notes: The RIAA's brief makes the novel contention, contradicting its lawyers' arguments at the Supreme Court in MGM v. [read post]