Search for: "People v Then"
Results 621 - 640
of 72,527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 6:50 pm
Candidate at Syracuse University College of Law and Intern at Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLPYesterday, the New York Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The Court's opinion in People ex rel. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:46 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Unfortunately, though, that is what happened to our client in People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:03 am
Jurors from Capitol Records, et al v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm
My strong recommendation is nonetheless that you should not let people buy Ecstacy from you through the admittedly expedient means of sending you a text message.Here's one reason why. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:46 pm
See which one you find more persuasive.I'm generally not into people touching my junk. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:37 pm
So when they find a dying dog on your patio and a dead dog in your freezer, they get to arrest you, and you can't legitimately complain about the search.Seems so to the Court of Appeal as well.Exigent circumstances aren't just for people. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:35 am
Are there new people to be determined in this story? [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
I truly and sincerely don't understand why people think that testimony like this is permissible.Defendant gets charged with molesting his stepdaughter. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm
In PLIVA v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
But shortly thereafter, the United States Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry… [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
California's pandering statute punishes anyone who "encourages another person to become a prostitute" by "promises, threats, violence, or by any device or scheme," so it sems that if one of my goals in making the statement was to encourage people to think about prostitution rather than some other job, I'm guilty, right? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Allegedly looking for other victims or other people in the house. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from outside. [read post]
