Search for: "People v Weeks"
Results 621 - 640
of 15,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
By Tom Kaufman: Arias v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
On to the biggest story of the week: Tuesday’s oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
Which federal court ruled this week that the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court Ruling a Blow to Genetic Privacy The Supreme Court's 5-4 Maryland v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
For the second time in a week, the Ninth Circuit held that Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:24 am
Texas to execute Mentally RetardedMan on April 11, 2007Since April 11th is only a week away, I suggest that people telephone,write or visit Texas State Senator Rodney Ellis.Rodney Ellis has repeatedly introduced Texas State Legislation to dealwith how the Texas courts are to handle Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:30 am
Here is the first paragraph of Mayor v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
This week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court: This Thursday, Dec. 20th: 9:00 AM - Rosalio Pedraza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Doe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
I doubt I will be quite so prolific this week as I am going to be back on a suppression hearing on Tuesday and maybe Wednesday in People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
The Download of the Week is Vagueness and the Guidance of Action by Jeremy Waldron. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, we exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895; People v Valdez, 41 AD3d 1255, lv denied 9 NY3d 882).Last week, in People v Cambridge (2008 NY Slip Op 07435 [10/3/08]) the Court went a step further and corrected such an unpreserved error, in the interest of justice, depsite… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 3:03 am
If the plan/policy does not specify what the statute of limitations is, then your state's statute of limitation applies.Copyright (c) 2008 by John V. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
However, judicial office holders who blog (or who post comments on other people’s blogs) must not identify themselves as members of the judiciary. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am
I shall write about two of them on this blog next week: United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:34 am
" The class action lawsuit, Claybrooks v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 5:06 am
Having posted this week about the Supreme Court's decision in Florence v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:43 am
"[V]ideo on demand is something of a conceptual oxymoron, since most people who demand video often don't know what they want. [read post]
