Search for: "People v. Alexander"
Results 621 - 640
of 844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2025, 10:37 pm
This includes prohibiting exploiting and/or trafficking potential parent(s), surrogates, gamete donors, and/or the people born as a result of such practices and requires protection of vulnerable people and/or populations. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 10:37 pm
This includes prohibiting exploiting and/or trafficking potential parent(s), surrogates, gamete donors, and/or the people born as a result of such practices and requires protection of vulnerable people and/or populations. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:10 am
Frank Thorp V reports for NBC News. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Alexander Hamilton explained to the people of New York, perhaps optimistically, that the new federalist system would suppress completely "the attempts of the government to establish a tyranny":"[I]n a confederacy the people, without exaggeration, may be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:19 pm
(Remember Bush v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Alexander Pearl, Human Rights, Indigenous Peoples, and the Global Climate Crisis, 53 Wake Forest L. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:21 am
My guess is that many, if not most, people believe at least some of these statements. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:01 am
In Charles I of Spain (later the most Catholic Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V), Magellan found a willing patron. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:01 am
In Charles I of Spain (later the most Catholic Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V), Magellan found a willing patron. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
Alexander Hamilton argument for “energy in the executive” is famous, but even those who read Federalist 70 often miss his deeper point. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
The final result in Colistro v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Moreover, in Chisholm v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Vitale, prohibiting school prayer, Reynolds v. [read post]
