Search for: "People v. Ball"
Results 621 - 640
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink“. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
If you text the word invite, I‑N‑V‑I‑T‑E, we’ll know about that. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:57 am
The case was People v Rice, 2007 NY Slip Op 06503 decided by the First Department on August 23. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:41 am
That change came about not only because they could become active politically, but also because people came to realize, sometimes to their shock and dismay, that their children, their neighbors, their friends, their co-workers were gays and lesbians ... [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Vance v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm
” If one were writing a latter-day Gilbert and Sullivan ditty about "people who would not be missed," Norquist would surely be a strong candidate to head the list. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Another area that is affected by the machines built-in assumptions are tests done on people suffering from anemia. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
That’s what happened in the case of Charm v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 8:29 am
In fact, the decision might best be thought of as something of a Rorschach test inside a crystal ball: different people can see different things in it, especially when they try to envision what comes next. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm
A majority of the CAVC held in Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am
As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm
That is, just hire people who, as a far as ascertainable by way of past behaviour and personal judgment, are on the ball and not prone to sloppy or careless habits. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:08 pm
” In People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:53 am
Whatever one thinks of Mitchell's reasoning, it's curious to learn that ADF again purports to find authority in Dean v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
One of the frustrated women umpires, Pam Postema, wrote a book about her mistreatment, You've Got to Have Balls to Make It in This League, a portion of which is worth quoting: Almost all of the people in the baseball community don't want anyone interrupting their little male-dominated way of life. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Vance v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:45 pm
Vocabulary leaching, v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
But on the narrow issue of conservative v. something else--well, kudos to Mark for trying. [read post]
