Search for: "People v. Bosse" Results 621 - 640 of 882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
And I was watching the boss of it all promoting the ship, perhaps the ugliest sea going vessel since the coracle was invented, a floating 1970s council estate, on BBC news this morning. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 pm by Mark Bennett
In fact, they had an incentive to do worse than work hard; to do the wrong thing: Republican bosses got caught putting pressure on appellate judges to change their ruling (in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority (DPA) raised concerns that the Covid-19 track and trace software, called “Smittestopp,” poses a disproportionate threat to user privacy — including by continuously tracking and uploading people’s GPS location to a national database for half a year. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
JAG HUNTER here: (posting from the Sweetwater, Tennessee Library) STEELE'S MARCH (PART III)(PART I) - (PART II) - (PART IV) - (PART V with related links)This narrative is intended to explain how and why senior commanders forced-marched Michael Steele into exile, and Steel's innocent subordinates into Defense Department catacombs. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am by Michael Scutt
  Nick Clegg said in a rather unwise comment that he abhorred overpaid people getting paid too much. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm by David Lat
If a former Thomas clerk can’t get his boss to join in the oral argument fun, who can? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
In Harris, the Justices questioned the foundation for the precedent, established in Abood v. [read post]