Search for: "People v. Jefferson" Results 621 - 640 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
WHEREAS, the Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" and the Tenth Amendment states "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Remember, Thomas Jefferson and others, the founders, suggested that impeachment was an organic process. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
Box 4210 Helena, MT 59604-4210 Phone: (406) 444-2590 (V/TTY); (877) 296-1197 (Toll Free) Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing or Deaf-Blind Montana Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services (MDHHS) 3911 Central Avenue P.O. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  People move to the cities and fertile farm land where wealth is to be had, so the more people a state had, the wealthier the state would be. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am by Guest Author
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
In addition, I think the culture of getting reelected has contributed greatly to members of Congress becoming completely out of touch with their constituents – they just don’t listen to the people that elected them. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Once granted, the patent has immense value, and is protected against all but the strongest invalidity challenges thanks to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Microsoft v. i4i last summer. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 29, 2009)Remanding bench verdict against 56yo rejected applicant's age discrim claim; District Court failed to evaluate statement preferring "younger educated people" as possible direct evidence>11th Circuit>> Birdyshaw v. [read post]