Search for: "People v. Kennedy"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
No: Justices Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Kennedy. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
But today, the majority holds that the second State’s system—the system that produces honest government, working on behalf of all the people—clashes with our Constitution. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 8:58 am
Bush denounced the Dred Scott ruling as a coded signal that he would appoint Justices to overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
When Anthony Kennedy didn’t take advantage of his last crack at gerrymandering while still on the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:14 pm
” Kennedy says. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 6:38 pm
Notably, Justice Kennedy spends only a single paragraph from his 56-page majority opinion in dismissing the relevance of his majority opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
The opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
And it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone familiar with Kennedy's dissent in Stenberg v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
Likewise, under Kennedy and Coker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
” He was critical of Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:30 am
Next week the Supreme Court will hear Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm
The case, Whyte Monkee Productions v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm
(I think he made that observation in connection with some arguments around Cohen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:32 am
Nobody, but nobody, expected a different outcome after oral argument in Florence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
In the confirmation hearing, Kennedy ominously announced that the nominee was on the board of a group at Rutgers Law School that had invited bad people to speak. [read post]
