Search for: "People v. Manning" Results 621 - 640 of 8,214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
It’s quite another thing for the Justice Department to prosecute a man who is actively running against the incumbent president and would, if elected, fire the attorney general. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 11:19 am by Eliana Baer
The threat need not be such as would put a brave man, or even a man of ordinary firmness, in fear. [read post]
This deviation from the standard 12-person jury was permitted by the 1970 US Supreme Court ruling in Williams v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:44 am by jonathanturley
  N.B.: The original version of this blog posting noted the controversy over Fetterman allegedly saying that he “celebrated the death of Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
S. 399 (1923), “basic civil rights of man,” Skinner v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by Michael Oykhman
Where two people participate in an indecent act, the presence of a participant in the act does not meet the requirement of “in the presence of one or more persons” (see: R v Follet, 1994 CanLII 10217 (NLCA)). [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 14, a criminal with an AR rifle had murdered 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Quinta Jurecic
In June 2022, police arrested an armed man near the house of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh after the man, Nicholas Roske, called 911 and explained that he was planning to assassinate the justice; the FBI has alleged that Roske texted a friend beforehand explaining that he planned to kill Kavanaugh in order to “stop roe v wade from being overturned. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
McLellan v Birbilis In McLellan v Birbilis, 2021 ONSC 7084, Justice Nicole Tellier debunked (again!) [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
Organisations that do not act responsibly, posing risks to vulnerable people, or fail to meet ICO expectations will be investigated. [read post]