Search for: "People v. Market"
Results 621 - 640
of 9,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
Citing Doe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:27 am
Haas v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
She will also be helping the company expand globally and enter new markets. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The growing appreciation of the role of federal policy in racializing housing markets should counter the notion that the movement out of cities over the past 50 years is an a-political, rational matter of people “voting with their feet. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
In my previous post I already said that this case--the biggest and highest-profile one in the history of the UK and one of the most important antitrust cases the world has ever seen--could further delay the Optis Wireless v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
As Europeans, we would like to rejoice at the prospect of witnessing the EU progressing towards an “ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” with a unified patent law under a unitary title and a jurisdiction with transnational competence for patent litigation. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Data privacy and data protection The NHS has been found to have breached data protection rules by sharing patient details with Meta, despite promises not to use confidential personal information about health and care for marketing purposes. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 8:22 am
Case citation: Schneider v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
[1] Appendix V of the Regulatory Program of the United States Government, April 1, 1992–March 31, 1993 The post Circular Reasoning? [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:48 am
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
Data privacy and data protection The HawkTalk blog explains how the Digital Protection and Digital Information (No.2) Bill (DPDI (No 2) Bill) overturns the third-party direct marketing rules in relation to data subject’s consent that have applied since the DPA1984, with the effect that third-party marketeers will be able to lawfully rely on legitimate interest for such marketing. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Nor can it be said to show that Defendants’ marketing strategy made confusion likely. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
